by Mike Brown
I’ll be blogging on various marketing topics-research, branding, strategic marketing, and communications. While my experience is in B2B services marketing, there’s a slant toward applying B2C approaches in business markets. I’ll also draw from interactions with marketers at the various conferences at which I speak. Posts will be experienced-based and delivered in a lesson format that you can apply to your business situations.
Marketing and Sales Blogs
I was talking with a strategic mentorabout a situation in his current job. A couple of new people not in his organization are involved in several efforts he’s leading. The challenge is that neither of them, although very junior to him, has entered this new business relationship with a learning mindset – either through trust-related issues or no self-recognition of their development needs.
The net of it, as he explained it, is that at this point in his career, he doesn’t feel compelled to go out of his way to include them in certain aspects of the project that would help develop them since they aren’t willing students.
I reminded him that if he were being true to his convictions, he would embrace the opportunity to cross organizational boundaries and grow two people who it sounded like could clearly benefit from his wisdom – as I had earlier in my career.
He was driving during our conversation, with his wife hearing his comments on why these two people didn’t deserve the opportunity. After getting off the phone with me, she asked him to explain the situation and told him the same thing – if he were true to what he “preached,” he had no choice but to include and help both of them!
Remember when you enter into a strategic mentorship relationship, that it’s very much a two-way street. Just as a strategic mentor should challenge and help shape your point of view, there are times when you have to turn the tables and challenge them also.
I’ve been blogging a year, with websites on strategy & innovation, life purpose, and even sketchy ties to a corporate humor blog.
Among business acquaintances, I now get frequent blogging questions. There’s no shortage of web articles on it, but here are lessons learned directly from writing one:
Know why you’re going to blog – Before starting, determine your reasons for blogging. Knowing it is for the discipline of writing a book sustains me while slowly building an online audience.
Establish rules for yourself – Guiding principles will simplify decisions and your effort. I knew early on I’d cover general work-related topics without mentioning my employer specifically. Additional guides include the number of words (generally under 300), how often to publish (daily except holidays), and topic categories (limiting content to 20 topic areas).
Write for a month before publishing – After deciding how often to publish, write a month’s worth of posts before putting something online. This provides three advantages:
- You’ll discover how much effort blogging will take and can adjust your frequency to ensure you’ll sustain it.
- It will help refine your writing skills.
- You’ll have a backlog of material for when your creative juices run dry.
Create an editorial calendar – Get a big desk calendar, some small post-it notes, and plan out a few months worth of topics. Knowing where you’re headed is helpful and the flexibility of modifying where you’re headed (by moving the post-its around) is essential. Another hint – after 6 months, throw out any still-unwritten topics to freshen future content.
Capture ideas all the time – Always have something to write down blogging ideas. Never lose a potentially viable idea. Ask yourself daily what happened that might have blog potential. It’s a great relief later to thumb through a notebook of starter idea fragments.
Keep a hidden blog – After setting up your main blog, establish a hidden one where you can experiment with graphics, pre-publish posts to see how they’ll look, and work out bugs as you experiment with blogging.
For more ideas, check out my Brainzooming blog this week for other lessons on writing, graphics, and interaction that have emerged from blogging.
Want to improve your team’s performance?
Here’s an idea – make sure you’re a fan of everybody working with you.
What does that mean?
Same as being a fan of a performer, musician, or athlete. It means establishing a connection with each person and identifying something (or many things) you celebrate and would like to emulate about them. Just as performers and athletes can rise to the occasion when their fans are cheering them on, you also need to cheer on the members of your team on their star performances.
This also implies that when team members aren’t successful, you still stick with and encourage them.
Trust me – I understand this isn’t always easy or even possible. I’ve had a few people on my teams who are like reluctant star athletes that no matter what the fans do, they make it clear they don’t care about fans, appreciation, or rising to any occasion. That’s okay. Sometimes you have to change your allegiances and not be a fan anymore.
But the overwhelming number of people you work with will appreciate you being a vocal and visible fan, rewarding the team with stronger performance each day!
Watching the World Series brought back a favorite baseball story. It’s been so long since I heard it, who knows if it’s true, but it’s so rich with great strategy lessons, it almost doesn’t matter!
The Story
During a Yankee World Series appearance, Joe DiMaggio’s arm was reportedly injured. Scouting reports said opponents could run on anything hit to center since supposedly DiMaggio couldn’t throw.
How did DiMaggio deal with this blatant weakness?
Even though hurt, he could make one throw a day. Most people would save that one throw for an important play late in the game. Not DiMaggio. Before the game, with the opposing team on-field, he’d uncork a bullet from center to home plate. Seeing this for themselves, the other team wouldn’t dare try to take advantage of DiMaggio’s arm by attempting to grab an extra base when things really counted.
The Lessons
Lesson one focuses on the fundamental strategic question, “What matters?” In this case, preventing runners from advancing on balls hit to center was paramount. And since DiMaggio’s physical prowess was failing him, he used an alternative - his mental skill – to accomplish this important objective. That adeptness demonstrates a true strategic perspective.
The second strategic lesson is that you don’t have to display all your capabilities all the time for them to be effective. DiMaggio relied on his reputation, with only slight real evidence, to create a larger-than-reality perception.
Applying the Lessons
The first lesson’s application is relatively clear: understand the desired objective and be open to unconventional ways to accomplish it.
The second lesson is perhaps more subtle. Suppose you have a capability that’s beneficial but isn’t natural for you or not one of your strongest traits. While it’s fine to not rely on the capability, you may still need to let people know it’s in your repertoire.
For example, one colleague at work had been characterized as too mild-mannered to lead. He assured me he did have passion and fire, although it wasn’t natural for him to display it. I shared the DiMaggio story, encouraging him to pick a spot and display his passion (maybe even some temper) with a group who would share the incident. He ignored the advice and ultimately got caught up in layoffs, in part, because of his perceived lack of toughness.
Another equally mild-manner person at work, however, is viewed differently. At specific points in his career in front of the right audiences, he’s displayed flashes of temper in challenging others. As a result, he’s seen as having the “fire” of a strong leader. He hardly ever displays this personality trait, but people know it’s there and don’t cross him unnecessarily because of it.
What It May Mean for You
Ask yourself – do you have perceived weaknesses springing not from lack of ability, but from unwillingness to do things that don’t come naturally? If a perceived defect relates to something important personally or for career success, figure out how and when to demonstrate that it isn’t really a weakness.
Doing this can help prevent others from trying to take advantage of you when it really counts!
I spoke last week at the IIR The Market Research Event in Los Angeles.
One session discussed “creative consumers.” They were nearly reverently described as “consumers” serving as paid ideation session participants; this, after passing personality tests (both oral and written) and receiving creativity technique training. They were lauded for being able to write dead-on concept statements. According to Marla Commons, co-presenter from Research International, the firm has a panel of at least 250 “creative consumers” with varied backgrounds available to corporations. In reviewing some profiles, one “consumer” has been doing this for 17 years!
Kraft Foods (the other presenter) applied the technique to design service concepts. “Creative consumers” were included at a one-to-one rate with corporate executives (or “drones,” although the term was never actually used) to inject creativity. The first day-long session produced 154 ideas from five custom exercises; these were narrowed eventually to 15 for further development in a second day-long session.
A couple of observations (recognizing that I do ideation primarily in a B2B environment):
* The best ideation sessions don’t require 50% creatives. At 20% of participants, they can really drive creative instigation while remaining participants contribute to other business aspects being explored. Going higher saps the diversity critical for innovative ideas.
* Lack of diversity can hamper the evaluation phase. Interestingly, two later rejected concepts shared to show the group’s creativity both fell apart based on density requirements. Not enough volume in a certain time period usually signals major problems. Density isn’t necessarily a concept driving CPG, but it’s a challenge readily apparent to service marketers since time is a perishable resource that can’t be inventoried. Here's where a little more diversity in a group could have been beneficial.
* One hundred fifty-four ideas isn’t that remarkable a number. We’ve seen 500 or 600 ideas from a more diverse participant group. The number of raw ideas is highly dependent on what your session objectives are and using the right tools to help realize your goals.
* It’s ridiculous to call these participants “consumers.” While companies want to feel they’re involving real consumers in the ideation process, that’s suspect. They may have familiarity and experience in the topic. But with the testing, training, and pay involved ($500-$1500 daily), they’re really “part-time, informal creative staff members.” Seventeen years in, somebody doesn’t enter a session with a completely fresh “consumer” perspective.
This is a great concept, but appears to be misrepresented and oversold. The funniest moment was during Q&A when someone asked apprehensively if the creative consumers could travel. I turned to the guy next to me and asked, “I wonder what they eat?”
Probably special pellets to generate creative sparks!
Work groups can unnecessarily gravitate toward routine options when new possibilities are evaluated. One way to counteract that is by using a twist on the typical prioritization approach.
Label one axis “ease of implementation,” with a range of “simple” to “complex” to implement. On the X axis, instead of the “expected benefit,” use the “level of comfort with the idea” and a “very” to “not very” scale (as shown in the diagram).
Having a team prioritize ideas this way creates new discussion areas for how the group addresses opportunities. For simple uncomfortable ideas, there’s a need to understand what creates discomfort. For ideas with greater implementation complexity that create discomfort, probe if there’s long-term potential to create competitive advantage (or figure out how to implement the idea with greater ease). The key to both cells is identifying the heart of the discomfort. Is it because the idea is significantly flawed or is it because the idea is new, challenging, and unfamiliar? If it’s the latter, that’s usually a clear sign that the idea could yield tremendous potential for customers, who aren’t part of a company’s internal resistance.
Try the approach and see what it does to move your group toward possibilities that represent more dramatic market changes and impacts.

